 |
SUN, 29 APR 2001 01:45:21 GMT
Dualism and Nervousness in Relations Between Tirana and Skoplje
AIM Tirana, April 20, 2001
On April 12, the same date when Macedonian Prime Minister Ljubco
Georgijevski asked the Albanian Government to help by interceding with
the Albanian political parties in Macedonia to agree to form a
broadly-based coalition Government with two main Macedonian parties, the
spokesman for the Macedonian Government, Antonio Milosovski openly
criticised the Albanian Government for mistakes committed in the
population census conducted in Albania in April. According to him it was
intended to prevent the determination of the exact number of members of
the Macedonian minority in Albania, which is officially about 5 thousand
persons. According to the latest statements of the Skoplje officials,
there are 300 thousand Albanians in Macedonia, a figure that Tirana
considers absurd. This game with figures actually symbolises the state
of complex relations between Albania and Macedonia, which is
characterised by dualism, more internal than public one, and certain
nervousness that has additionally increased during the latest Macedonian
crisis.
The Albanian Government was among the first to side with the Macedonian
Government in its problems with the armed Albanian guerrilla fighters
who appeared with "UCK" insignia (NLA-National Liberation Army) near
Tetovo. The Albanian leaders strongly condemned the violence and
extremism of their fellow-countrymen and supported the sovereignty of
the Macedonian state. Tirana's support was so unequivocal that it was
positively assessed not only by leaders of the European Union and NATO,
but also by Macedonia's Prime Minister Georgijevski, President
Trajkovski and Foreign Minister Kerim, who publicly thanked the Albanian
Government for the support extended.
Nevertheless, Tirana and Skoplje had diametrically opposite stand
regarding the roots of the latest crisis in Macedonia. While during the
entire crisis the Macedonian leadership insisted that events on hills
around Tetovo were nothing else but an armed aggression, which came from
Kosovo, Albania's leadership, maintained that the crisis was a result of
internal developments and accumulated problems because the Macedonian
Government failed to adequately resolve the inter-ethnic relations.
Actually, despite the harsh condemnation of the Albanian guerrilla
fighters in Macedonia by the European Union, NATO, OSCE and Western
countries, they were practically unanimous in suggesting that an
internal dialogue should be opened between the Macedonian Government and
the Albanian political parties with a view to discussing problems of
inter-ethnic relations and demands of the local Albanian population,
which materialised with the initiation of a dialogue under President
Trajkovski's presidency.
At the time when the conflict in Tetovo was placed under control and
the inter-ethnic dialogue between the Macedonian Government and Albanian
political parties was initiated, Skoplje addressed several accusations
against Tirana for allowing the entry of armed groups of the National
Liberation Army, which is operating in Macedonia. On April 4, one of the
front men of the Macedonian Ministry of the Interior, Deputy Minister
Ljuben Boskovski said that a group of 50 armed persons wearing NLA
uniforms entered Macedonia from Albania near Debar, contacted local
people so as to recruit and mobilise them and then returned to Albania.
The Macedonian media amplified this accusation even more by stating that
14 military training camps for 4,500 soldiers of the so-called NLA had
been built in Albania. In addition, information was published that a new
hotbeds of tension were developing in this border zone, but the Albanian
Ministry of Order and the Albanian Prime Minister immediately denied and
rejected these accusations both regarding the camps, as well as armed
groups crossing the border between two countries.
Trying to convince the international community that it had nothing to
do with the creation of tensions at its border with Macedonia, the
Albanian Government officially asked NATO to send its mission in order
to help control and supervise the border between Albania and Macedonia.
The North Atlantic Alliance positively answered to this request. Apart
from that, on April 12 the Minister of the Interior, the Defence
Minister and President of the Albanian National Information Service
together organised a meeting with the military attaches accredited in
Albania so as to assure the international community of strong control
measures undertaken by the Albanian Army on the border, which sent more
than 100 military commandos to the Debar prefecture as reinforcement to
the border police forces.
Diplomatic and international missions present in Tirana do not rule out
a possibility that criminal trade in arms might revive between these two
countries and, in order to confirm this, on April 14 in Librazde, the
Albanian police forces arrested two young Kosovars transporting 5 guns,
one mortar and one pistol towards Macedonian border. However, the
international mission in the Albanian capital seem to be inclined to
believe that the Albanian Government is not officially involved with the
guerrilla groups operating in Macedonia.
The increasing nervousness, which has been characteristic of the
Albanian-Macedonian relations during the latest crisis, has been
demonstrated in one more way. According to confidential sources here in
Tirana, on March 31 the Foreign Ministry of Macedonia sent a note of
protest to Albania because of what it qualified as "border incident"
which, according to it, concerned the violation of the Macedonian
airspace by a KFOR helicopter coming from Albania. The Macedonian side
sent its note of protest on the day of the alleged event, although it
admitted that the KFOR mission with the Macedonian Defence Ministry
claimed that no KFOR helicopter had flown that day on the airline
between two countries. The Command of KFOR forces deployed in Albania in
the city of Durrese also denied that there had been any such flight. In
its reply to the note, Tirana rejected the Macedonian protest as
unfounded, as well as all claims that the KFOR helicopter had been a
cause of a border incident between the two countries.
Implicating the KFOR in bilateral relations represents a new element,
but it seems that precisely that name has forced both sides not to
publicise their official protests and counter-protests concerning this
event.
AIM Tirana
Arjan LEKA
|
 |